Sometimes the words tell only part of the story.
A person may say they are fine, but their voice becomes quieter. They may talk quickly through one part of the story, then slow down when they reach another. There may be a pause where there wasn’t one before. A laugh may appear in the middle of something painful.
None of this tells a counsellor what the person is feeling. It does, however, tell us that something may have shifted.
That shift is often heard through prosody. Prosody is the way the voice carries the words. It can be heard in changes in pace, pitch, volume, rhythm or even the length of a pause. Most people notice these shifts without consciously thinking about them. We hear when a familiar voice changes. We know when ‘I’m okay’ doesn’t quite sound like the last ‘I’m okay’.
In counselling, that change can matter. But it is easy to get it wrong.
A quieter voice is not automatically sadness. Faster speech is not automatically anxiety. A laugh does not automatically mean discomfort. People speak differently because of culture, personality, neurodivergence, tiredness, medication, habit and the relationship they have with the person listening. Sometimes a pause is full of feeling. Sometimes someone is simply trying to remember what happened next.
Prosody is information. It is not a diagnosis.
I have found it more useful to listen for a change in the person’s own voice than to compare their voice with how someone is supposedly meant to sound. Did their pace change? Did a word suddenly carry more weight? Did their voice become flatter, softer or less certain? What happened just before that change?
The question is not, ‘What does that tone mean?’ The better question is, ‘Is there something here worth becoming curious about?’
Research supports the idea that voice and words work together in therapeutic conversations. Studies have found patterns in the way clients and therapists use speech and vocal qualities during moments of change, tension and connection. They have also found something equally important: the same vocal quality can serve different purposes in different conversations.
That leaves the counsellor with a choice. We can hear a change and quietly decide what it means. Or we can hear it, hold our interpretation lightly and invite the client to tell us.
I prefer the second.
It may sound as simple as, ‘I noticed your voice became quieter when you mentioned your father. Did you notice that too?’ Or, ‘You seemed to speed up as you reached that part of the story. What was happening for you just then?’
A longer pause might invite, ‘There was a pause before you answered. Would it be useful to stay there for a moment?’ If someone laughs while describing something painful, the counsellor might say, ‘I noticed the laugh as you said that. I don’t want to assume what it meant. What was happening for you?’
The wording is less important than the position behind it. Notice. Become curious. Say what was actually heard. Then let the client make meaning of it.
Perhaps the client had not noticed the change. Perhaps they had, but did not yet have words for it. Perhaps the observation is wrong. A client may shrug and say it meant nothing. That is useful too. Curiosity has to leave room for correction, otherwise it is only interpretation dressed up as a question.
There is another risk. Once counsellors learn to listen for prosody, they can begin listening too hard. Every pause becomes significant. Every change in pitch needs explaining. The conversation starts to feel less like two people talking and more like one person being examined under a microscope.
That is not being present.
Prosody is one part of the conversation. It sits alongside the words, the person’s history, their body, culture, circumstances and what is happening between client and counsellor in that moment. Sometimes it opens a door. Sometimes the best response is to notice it quietly and keep listening.
Cross-cultural research offers a useful warning here. Although there are shared patterns in emotional speech, individual and cultural differences have a larger influence than any simple universal map between a sound and an emotion.
Research involving autistic people is also mixed, which is another reason to be cautious about treating one style of speaking or listening as the norm.
Good counselling does not require the counsellor to be right about what a voice means. It requires enough attention to notice that something may have changed, and enough humility to ask.
Sometimes the words carry the story. Sometimes the voice writes something in the margin.
Both are worth listening to.
About the author
Oliver de Nicolai, BA, GradDip Counselling, MCouns, is an ACA Level 4 counsellor and clinical supervisor and the principal of Blue Healers Counselling in Graceville, Brisbane. He works with adults and couples across trauma, grief, anxiety, emotional regulation, relationships and occupational stress, including current and former first responders. His practice is informed by 15 years of operational policing experience.
References
Avdi, E., Seikkula, J., Karvonen, A., Kaartinen, J., Penttonen, M., & Kykyri, V. L. (2020). Exploring conversational and physiological aspects of psychotherapy interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 591124.
Larrouy-Maestri, P., Poeppel, D., & Pell, M. D. (2025). The sound of emotional prosody: Nearly three decades of research and future directions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 20(4), 623-638.
Tomicic, A., Martínez, C., Pérez, J. C., Hollenstein, T., Angulo, S., Gerstmann, A., Barroux, I., & Krause, M. (2015). Discourse-voice regulatory strategies in the psychotherapeutic interaction: A state-space dynamics analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 378.
van Rijn, P., & Larrouy-Maestri, P. (2023). Modelling individual and cross-cultural variation in the mapping of emotions to speech prosody. Nature Human Behaviour, 7, 386-396.
Weiste, E., & Peräkylä, A. (2014). Prosody and empathic communication in psychotherapy interaction. Psychotherapy Research, 24(6), 687-701.
Zhang, M., Xu, S., Chen, Y., Lin, Y., Ding, H., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Recognition of affective prosody in autism spectrum conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Autism, 26(4), 798-813.